Hockey Talk & Video Games Too.

[Poseidon]

......until Carl Gunnarsson’s brain cramp began a sequence that led to a wraparound goal from Phoenix centre Martin Hanzal

this is 100% accurate, that guy NEVER makes a good play and should sit the whole f**king game,

 

[Salty Cracker]

That one goal in the shootout was no goal.  I don't know how they can suddenly see through pads and legs now, but if you can't confirm it's 100% over the line, then it's no goal.  That was a gift to the Leafs for sure.

 

[Poseidon]

That one goal in the shootout was no goal.  I don't know how they can suddenly see through pads and legs now, but if you can't confirm it's 100% over the line, then it's no goal.  That was a gift to the Leafs for sure.

oh common....
his pad was over the goal line, it was OBVIOUSLY in, you just COULDNT SEE it.... if thats what hockey is going to turn into, rules over logic than f**K it, im watching volleyball.

glad your not running operations.

 

[reeffreak]

That was a definite goal !! You can't tell me that wasn't. He was 100% IN the net and what a little girl move trying to hide the puck from the refs. It's a mans game, you got scored on,  deal with it and crying to the ref as the next player was ready to shoot, lame.

On another note, Boston shit the bed to Buffalo hahaha and the Penguins are lighting it up big time!!!!

 

[Salty Cracker]

[quote author=Salty Cracker link=topic=6258.msg74052#msg74052 date=1387554887]
That one goal in the shootout was no goal.  I don't know how they can suddenly see through pads and legs now, but if you can't confirm it's 100% over the line, then it's no goal.  That was a gift to the Leafs for sure.

oh common....
his pad was over the goal line, it was OBVIOUSLY in, you just COULDNT SEE it.... if thats what hockey is going to turn into, rules over logic than f**K it, im watching volleyball.

glad your not running operations.
[/quote]

That's the rules though, that's how they read.  I don't make them.  I watched them replay it 20x and it looks like the shadow of the puck is on the line under his pad, and only 60% of his pad was over the line, so you can't say for sure it was over the line, so it shouldn't be a goal.  That's what happens when you get officials that consistently can't call plays and goals properly.  So don't blame the rules, blame the bad officiating. 

I've always been in favour of a chip in the puck that tells you 100% that the puck is over the line.  It would eliminate a lot of that BS on these things.  It's either in or it's not, and ones that sneak in then get pulled back out...they would be goals too. 

 

[Salty Cracker]

That was a definite goal !! You can't tell me that wasn't. He was 100% IN the net and what a little girl move trying to hide the puck from the refs. It's a mans game, you got scored on,  deal with it and crying to the ref as the next player was ready to shoot, lame.

On another note, Boston shit the bed to Buffalo hahaha and the Penguins are lighting it up big time!!!!

I think the penguins are favoured to win the cup this year.

Of course, they were last year too. 

 

[Poseidon]

[quote author=Poseidon link=topic=6258.msg74053#msg74053 date=1387555041]
[quote author=Salty Cracker link=topic=6258.msg74052#msg74052 date=1387554887]
That one goal in the shootout was no goal.  I don't know how they can suddenly see through pads and legs now, but if you can't confirm it's 100% over the line, then it's no goal.  That was a gift to the Leafs for sure.

oh common....
his pad was over the goal line, it was OBVIOUSLY in, you just COULDNT SEE it.... if thats what hockey is going to turn into, rules over logic than f**K it, im watching volleyball.

glad your not running operations.
[/quote]

That's the rules though, that's how they read.  I don't make them.  I watched them replay it 20x and it looks like the shadow of the puck is on the line under his pad, and only 60% of his pad was over the line, so you can't say for sure it was over the line, so it shouldn't be a goal.  That's what happens when you get officials that consistently can't call plays and goals properly.  So don't blame the rules, blame the bad officiating. 

I've always been in favour of a chip in the puck that tells you 100% that the puck is over the line.  It would eliminate a lot of that BS on these things.  It's either in or it's not, and ones that sneak in then get pulled back out...they would be goals too. 
[/quote]

its not bad officiating, it was reviewed by hockey operations and they concluded it was a goal...

 

[Salty Cracker]

[quote author=Salty Cracker link=topic=6258.msg74056#msg74056 date=1387555387]
[quote author=Poseidon link=topic=6258.msg74053#msg74053 date=1387555041]
[quote author=Salty Cracker link=topic=6258.msg74052#msg74052 date=1387554887]
That one goal in the shootout was no goal.  I don't know how they can suddenly see through pads and legs now, but if you can't confirm it's 100% over the line, then it's no goal.  That was a gift to the Leafs for sure.

oh common....
his pad was over the goal line, it was OBVIOUSLY in, you just COULDNT SEE it.... if thats what hockey is going to turn into, rules over logic than f**K it, im watching volleyball.

glad your not running operations.
[/quote]

That's the rules though, that's how they read.  I don't make them.  I watched them replay it 20x and it looks like the shadow of the puck is on the line under his pad, and only 60% of his pad was over the line, so you can't say for sure it was over the line, so it shouldn't be a goal.  That's what happens when you get officials that consistently can't call plays and goals properly.  So don't blame the rules, blame the bad officiating. 

I've always been in favour of a chip in the puck that tells you 100% that the puck is over the line.  It would eliminate a lot of that BS on these things.  It's either in or it's not, and ones that sneak in then get pulled back out...they would be goals too. 
[/quote]

its not bad officiating, it was reviewed by hockey operations and they concluded it was a goal...
[/quote]

hockey operations in Toronto?

 

[Poseidon]

[quote author=Poseidon link=topic=6258.msg74058#msg74058 date=1387555503]
[quote author=Salty Cracker link=topic=6258.msg74056#msg74056 date=1387555387]
[quote author=Poseidon link=topic=6258.msg74053#msg74053 date=1387555041]
[quote author=Salty Cracker link=topic=6258.msg74052#msg74052 date=1387554887]
That one goal in the shootout was no goal.  I don't know how they can suddenly see through pads and legs now, but if you can't confirm it's 100% over the line, then it's no goal.  That was a gift to the Leafs for sure.

oh common....
his pad was over the goal line, it was OBVIOUSLY in, you just COULDNT SEE it.... if thats what hockey is going to turn into, rules over logic than f**K it, im watching volleyball.

glad your not running operations.
[/quote]

That's the rules though, that's how they read.  I don't make them.  I watched them replay it 20x and it looks like the shadow of the puck is on the line under his pad, and only 60% of his pad was over the line, so you can't say for sure it was over the line, so it shouldn't be a goal.  That's what happens when you get officials that consistently can't call plays and goals properly.  So don't blame the rules, blame the bad officiating. 

I've always been in favour of a chip in the puck that tells you 100% that the puck is over the line.  It would eliminate a lot of that BS on these things.  It's either in or it's not, and ones that sneak in then get pulled back out...they would be goals too. 
[/quote]

its not bad officiating, it was reviewed by hockey operations and they concluded it was a goal...
[/quote]

hockey operations in Toronto?
[/quote]

realllly... your going to be one of THOSE people,

its in the same CITY as an NHL team they MUST be going for that team....

sigh, and here i thought you where a smart, respectable hockey fan.

 

[Salty Cracker]

I'm not saying the officiating was bad last night, I'm saying they had to change the rules because officials don't know how to call games.  Some were caught calling games wrong on purpose so they had to step in the the overrule rule.  Last night was fine, I just can't say that puck was over the line, and I think phoenix fans have a right to be a bit upset, but like any OT win, if they wanted to win they should have done it in regular time, and not worry and silly shootout goals.

 

[Salty Cracker]

[quote author=Salty Cracker link=topic=6258.msg74060#msg74060 date=1387555555]
[quote author=Poseidon link=topic=6258.msg74058#msg74058 date=1387555503]
[quote author=Salty Cracker link=topic=6258.msg74056#msg74056 date=1387555387]
[quote author=Poseidon link=topic=6258.msg74053#msg74053 date=1387555041]
[quote author=Salty Cracker link=topic=6258.msg74052#msg74052 date=1387554887]
That one goal in the shootout was no goal.  I don't know how they can suddenly see through pads and legs now, but if you can't confirm it's 100% over the line, then it's no goal.  That was a gift to the Leafs for sure.

oh common....
his pad was over the goal line, it was OBVIOUSLY in, you just COULDNT SEE it.... if thats what hockey is going to turn into, rules over logic than f**K it, im watching volleyball.

glad your not running operations.
[/quote]

That's the rules though, that's how they read.  I don't make them.  I watched them replay it 20x and it looks like the shadow of the puck is on the line under his pad, and only 60% of his pad was over the line, so you can't say for sure it was over the line, so it shouldn't be a goal.  That's what happens when you get officials that consistently can't call plays and goals properly.  So don't blame the rules, blame the bad officiating. 

I've always been in favour of a chip in the puck that tells you 100% that the puck is over the line.  It would eliminate a lot of that BS on these things.  It's either in or it's not, and ones that sneak in then get pulled back out...they would be goals too. 
[/quote]

its not bad officiating, it was reviewed by hockey operations and they concluded it was a goal...
[/quote]

hockey operations in Toronto?
[/quote]

realllly... your going to be one of THOSE people,

its in the same CITY as an NHL team they MUST be going for that team....

sigh, and here i thought you where a smart, respectable hockey fan.
[/quote]

liar you did not. 

 

[Poseidon]

Re: HOCKEY talk & video games too.

[quote author=Poseidon link=topic=6258.msg74061#msg74061 date=1387555623]
[quote author=Salty Cracker link=topic=6258.msg74060#msg74060 date=1387555555]
[quote author=Poseidon link=topic=6258.msg74058#msg74058 date=1387555503]
[quote author=Salty Cracker link=topic=6258.msg74056#msg74056 date=1387555387]
[quote author=Poseidon link=topic=6258.msg74053#msg74053 date=1387555041]
[quote author=Salty Cracker link=topic=6258.msg74052#msg74052 date=1387554887]
That one goal in the shootout was no goal.  I don't know how they can suddenly see through pads and legs now, but if you can't confirm it's 100% over the line, then it's no goal.  That was a gift to the Leafs for sure.

oh common....
his pad was over the goal line, it was OBVIOUSLY in, you just COULDNT SEE it.... if thats what hockey is going to turn into, rules over logic than f**K it, im watching volleyball.

glad your not running operations.
[/quote]

That's the rules though, that's how they read.  I don't make them.  I watched them replay it 20x and it looks like the shadow of the puck is on the line under his pad, and only 60% of his pad was over the line, so you can't say for sure it was over the line, so it shouldn't be a goal.  That's what happens when you get officials that consistently can't call plays and goals properly.  So don't blame the rules, blame the bad officiating. 

I've always been in favour of a chip in the puck that tells you 100% that the puck is over the line.  It would eliminate a lot of that BS on these things.  It's either in or it's not, and ones that sneak in then get pulled back out...they would be goals too. 
[/quote]

its not bad officiating, it was reviewed by hockey operations and they concluded it was a goal...
[/quote]

hockey operations in Toronto?
[/quote]

realllly... your going to be one of THOSE people,

its in the same CITY as an NHL team they MUST be going for that team....

sigh, and here i thought you where a smart, respectable hockey fan.
[/quote]

liar you did not.
[/quote]

You got me, but still... Your smarter than THAT

 

[Salty Cracker]

[quote author=Salty Cracker link=topic=6258.msg74063#msg74063 date=1387555699]
[quote author=Poseidon link=topic=6258.msg74061#msg74061 date=1387555623]
[quote author=Salty Cracker link=topic=6258.msg74060#msg74060 date=1387555555]
[quote author=Poseidon link=topic=6258.msg74058#msg74058 date=1387555503]
[quote author=Salty Cracker link=topic=6258.msg74056#msg74056 date=1387555387]
[quote author=Poseidon link=topic=6258.msg74053#msg74053 date=1387555041]
[quote author=Salty Cracker link=topic=6258.msg74052#msg74052 date=1387554887]
That one goal in the shootout was no goal.  I don't know how they can suddenly see through pads and legs now, but if you can't confirm it's 100% over the line, then it's no goal.  That was a gift to the Leafs for sure.

oh common....
his pad was over the goal line, it was OBVIOUSLY in, you just COULDNT SEE it.... if thats what hockey is going to turn into, rules over logic than f**K it, im watching volleyball.

glad your not running operations.
[/quote]

That's the rules though, that's how they read.  I don't make them.  I watched them replay it 20x and it looks like the shadow of the puck is on the line under his pad, and only 60% of his pad was over the line, so you can't say for sure it was over the line, so it shouldn't be a goal.  That's what happens when you get officials that consistently can't call plays and goals properly.  So don't blame the rules, blame the bad officiating. 

I've always been in favour of a chip in the puck that tells you 100% that the puck is over the line.  It would eliminate a lot of that BS on these things.  It's either in or it's not, and ones that sneak in then get pulled back out...they would be goals too. 
[/quote]

its not bad officiating, it was reviewed by hockey operations and they concluded it was a goal...
[/quote]

hockey operations in Toronto?
[/quote]

realllly... your going to be one of THOSE people,

its in the same CITY as an NHL team they MUST be going for that team....

sigh, and here i thought you where a smart, respectable hockey fan.
[/quote]

liar you did not.
[/quote]

You got me, but still... Your smarter than THAT
[/quote]

am not.

 

[theyangman]

I agree. He isn't. I know him in person.

 

[Poseidon]

I agree. He isn't. I know him in person.

true, he DID take YOU on a lunch date, cant be all that bright.. hahaha

 

[theyangman]

It was two professionals meeting for lunch discussing business.

Kinda like what you do with your friends during recess, or lunch hour in the cafeteria, but more grown up.

Don't worry kiddo, you'll get here too one day.

 

[Poseidon]

It was two professionals meeting for lunch discussing business.

Kinda like what you do with your friends during recess, or lunch hour in the cafeteria, but more grown up.

Don't worry kiddo, you'll get here too one day.

transformers and my little ponys are not professional business topics

 

[theyangman]

My transformers collection is worth more than your car. The collection is not to be viewed as toys but a medium no different than a painting or sculpture.

As for My Little Pony you are going to have talk to Aaron.

 

[Poseidon]

My transformers collection is worth more than your car. The collection is not to be viewed as toys but a medium no different than a painting or sculpture.

As for My Little Pony you are going to have talk to Aaron.

haha oh probally..
nah, it is cool but i think its still a collection of toys, regardless how valuable they may be

 

[Quartapound]

Re: HOCKEY talk & video games too.

Anyone have an android tablet/phone? Want to watch every single NHL game in HD for free? Check this out. http://forum.mobilism.org/viewtopic.php?t=669786

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta