"universal restrictions" is an interesting term. Now who decides what the "universal restrictions" are? There's the crux of this conundrum, as I in no way recognize any politicians right to have dominion over me. Besides my wife, I don't recognize anyone's right to make me do anything unless I am breaking a fundamental law, such as murder.
The majority decides, since we (Canada) make effort to operate as a democracy. Democracy doesn't mean everyone gets what they want, it means that when faced with a polarizing issue everyone is invited to chime in, and the law or policy is based on what is said by the most people., not who says their opinion the loudest. Do you have a driver's license? Is it mandated? Yes. Does it guarantee or directly prevent you from getting drunk or speeding or stunt driving, and hitting a family with your car? No. Is it meant to minimize the risk of you improperly operating your vehicle? Yes. Seatbelts don't guarantee you won't get severely injured but they help mitigate that risk and in the event you do get injured, hopefully they reduce the severity.
It's a slippery slope, this "people need to worry about others". That's socialism. I reject socialism, and care not for what others think or do. I'll GLADLY go back to beating each other with sticks. In fact, bring it on, it will resolve SO MANY socials issues in about 30 days. All these people looking to defund the police or live in anarchy, I say let's do it.
So you reject public health care, and refuse to use it? We pay into the public health system with the taxes we pay on our incomes, regardless of if we ourselves need it or not, so that if someone needs medical attention the issue of "cost" is not a border to their treatment and convalescence.
Regarding "defunding the police", just to clarify what is actually being referred to; surely we can agree that if a police force needs a $400,000 a pop vehicle designed for and deployed by the military in areas of international conflict for civilian law enforcement, something has gone very, very wrong.
Here's the thing. I live on a mountain. Literally in the middle of nowhere. It's not worth anyone's effort to try and come here and bother me, so I'm stacking the deck in my favour. Of all the things I truly call my own on this world, is my mind and my body. Telling me you have the right to dictate what I do with either, is not negotiable.
There is an alternative to the vaccine; don't shop in person. No one has said you don't get to eat or purchase goods, but at the same time you don't get to make your choices about your body impact others.
I smoke. By your rationale you would have no issue with me sitting at a table next to you and your family enjoying a meal and lighting up. It's my choice to put all the crap in a cigarette in my body, so if you were to ask me to move or put the cigarette out, would you want my response to be "You can't dictate to me what I do with my body"?
And no one is telling you to think in one particular fashion or do anything with your mind.
I never thought I'd move out of the house I was in, but I saw how this could go if people started to believe that everyone "needs to comply". My wife and I have found ourselves a support group in the region, and it's big. Look up parallel society and you'll get an idea. We're set for absolutely everything if things go sideways. Food, medicine, everything up to major surgery (and we're working on that). There's a whole other world happening on the fringe. We obviously don't want that, and right now it's a group of people who contact each other outside of any social media, using encrypted messenger services, snail mail, landlines and ham radio. We're taking this seriously and we "recruited" more during the protests last weekend. There are a LOT of people who don't agree that liberals, conservatives, democrats, republicans, etc have any right to take away our freedoms, especially when the cause is so obviously corrupt.
That's cool, I 100% support that. The long term issue is that every country started with people looking to obtain "freedom". Freedom from religious persecution, freedom to pursue personal economic success, etc. What will always come up and sour that "freedom" is when two desires conflict with one another, then whether by force, by vote, or by class someone's "freedom" gets denied.
It's just base human nature.
Plus, I simply don't care if others are scared, that's not my problem. I don't care if they are scared of me, because I refuse to jab up, that's not my problem. I don't care if people think they have the right to jab me up, that's not my problem. The way I see it, all of these problems are those of the pro vax/pro totalitarians. I have no problem except I can't go into bars. Not a lot of bars at 4000 feet anyway, so I guess I'll just have to suffer.
I don't think the vast majority of people are scared of "you" (I mean we've never met, if you're a 6'5" guy built like a brick house then I imagine that number might be higher than usual), they're scared of getting sick.
Now don't regret adding to the conversation, at least your comment was thought out. It's just not acceptable (to many).
"Not acceptable"? Sounds like you're trying to control what I do with my mind (kidding)
Like I said, I have the luxury of just sitting by and watching this happen. It will be a LONG time before they come looking for my sorry ass, as I'm not a factor. I'm not raising shit on social media (besides this little blerb on a fish forum I suppose). In fact I don't belong to any social media, and one good thing about leftists...they are LAZY. If you don't exist on social media, you don't exist. There's a whole subculture in China that exists outside the social credit score, and that is under a legitimate dictatorship. We're only at the pseudo stage here in Canada. If trudeau tries to pass any "emergency measures" that give him more power, EVERYONE should be marching on Ottawa, not just the truckers. Unfortunately a lot of sheep will watch the cbc, blindly agree with whatever is said (again, bought-n-paid for by liberals using our own tax dollars), and it could get ugly.
I think that's something that keeps getting misunderstood or misrepresented, that it's a "local" or "national" issue rather than the global pandemic it is.
Austria, Ecuador, Germany, Indonesia, Micronesia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan all have or will shortly have vaccination mandate for all adults, and
multiple other countries have mandates determined by risk to the general public.
You didn't mention this, but just regarding the entire "drop the population" theory; anyone who would choose to do that via the vaccines when everyone is already on ultra high alert, I would expect such a person to have expired by choking on their own spit long before making it to public office.
This convoy is a great litmus test of each side in this debate. Who will give in and flinch first. I'm thinking the truckers will win, they are strong and trudeau sits and talks like a girl.
It's very showy, but I don't know what the substance is supposed to be. "Truckers should not have to be vaccinated"?. Okay. What do you say when police convoy to Ottawa, followed by the firefighters, followed by retail workers...
at which point is there no point to having access to the vaccine at all and we're left with the full unmitigated cost of the pandemic, not just in terms of national health, but international trade and commerce.